ANNOUNCEMENT: Expert Investor is now PA Europe. Read more.

top down trumps bottom up study finds

Asset allocation is more important to investment returns than security selection, according to research published by Global Financial Institute.

|

While academics have previously tackled this topic, achieving mixed results, the GFI study – which was conducted by Raghavendra Rau, a professor of finance at Cambridge University – claims to have analysed the data over a longer time-horizon than prior literature.

Importantly, Rau says, the data spans a wide range of asset classes including real estate and commodities, and covers 1991 to 2011 – a period which includes the so-called dotcom bust of 2001, as well as the more recent global banking/sovereign debt crisis.

One of the study’s key findings is that “skilled investors” should focus on asset allocation strategies, given the greater dispersion of returns – especially during economic crises.

It concludes: “The most important periods for asset allocation from 1991 to 2011 were February 1991, during the Gulf War; August 1998, when Russia defaulted; March 2000, the beginning of the bursting of the dotcom bubble; and September 2008, when Lehman Brothers collapsed near the start of the subprime mortgage crisis.

“By contrast, only the dotcom bubble was an important period for security selection.”

A copy of Asset Allocation vs. Stock Selection: Evidence from a Simulation Exercise can be downloaded here.

MORE ARTICLES ON